Statistics: State of Generative AI
November 9, 2024 (Updated: November 10, 2024)Read more about this event.
See also the 2024 summary.
Attendees
- Total: 23 people
 - Recurring: 11 people
 - New: 12 people
 
Feedback
- Responses: 9 people (39.13% of attendees)
 
1. Practical use: For my life, what we did today will have …
- Responses: 9 people (39.13% of attendees)
 - Answers:
- a lot of practical use (1): 3 people
 - quite a bit of practical use (2): 4 people
 - some practical use (3): 2 people
 - little practical use (4): 0 people
 - very little practical use (5): 0 people
 
 - Average answer: 1.89 (σ=0.78)
 

2. The atmosphere / vibe was …
- Responses: 9 people (39.13% of attendees)
 - Answers:
- fantastic (1): 3 people
 - good (2): 5 people
 - okay (3): 1 person
 - bad (4): 0 people
 - horrible (5): 0 people
 
 - Average answer: 1.78 (σ=0.67)
 

3. The amount of content / exercises covered was …
- Responses: 9 people (39.13% of attendees)
 - Answers:
- way too much (1): 0 people
 - too much (2): 1 person
 - just right (3): 8 people
 - too little (4): 0 people
 - way too little (5): 0 people
 
 - Average answer: 2.89 (σ=0.33)
 

4. The difficulty level of the content / discussion was …
- Responses: 9 people (39.13% of attendees)
 - Answers:
- much too easy (1): 0 people
 - too easy (2): 2 people
 - just right (3): 5 people
 - too difficult (4): 2 people
 - much too difficult (5): 0 people
 
 - Average answer: 3.00 (σ=0.71)
 

5. Structure: On the whole the event needed …
- Responses: 9 people (39.13% of attendees)
 - Answers:
- much more structure (1): 0 people
 - more structure (2): 0 people
 - (was just right) (3): 9 people
 - less structure (4): 0 people
 - much less structure (5): 0 people
 
 - Average answer: 3.00 (σ=0.00)
 

6. The moderation should have been …
- Responses: 9 people (39.13% of attendees)
 - Answers:
- much more relaxed (1): 0 people
 - more relaxed (2): 0 people
 - (was just right) (3): 9 people
 - more assertive (4): 0 people
 - much more assertive (5): 0 people
 
 - Average answer: 3.00 (σ=0.00)
 

7. Host preparation: The content / exercises were …
- Responses: 9 people (39.13% of attendees)
 - Answers:
- very well prepared (1): 6 people
 - well prepared (2): 2 people
 - okay prepared (3): 1 person
 - not well prepared (4): 0 people
 - not well prepared at all (5): 0 people
 
 - Average answer: 1.44 (σ=0.73)
 

8. Changing your mind: The event made me …
- Responses: 9 people (39.13% of attendees)
 - Answers:
- question many things (1): 1 person
 - question some things (2): 6 people
 - question few things (3): 2 people
 - question very few things (4): 0 people
 - not question anything (5): 0 people
 
 - Average answer: 2.11 (σ=0.60)
 

9. Do you think you will come to one (or more) of the next three events?
- Responses: 9 people (39.13% of attendees)
 - Answers:
- probably no: 0 people
 - probably yes: 9 people
 
 

10. If you answered “probably no” in the previous question or are very uncertain, why is that?
- Responses: 1 person (4.35% of attendees)
 - Answers:
- Friday evening is a bad timeslot for me.: 0 people
 - I can’t fit another activity into my life.: 0 people
 - I did not like (some of) the people here.: 0 people
 - I did not like today’s venue.: 0 people
 - I live too far away.: 1 person
 - I’m not very interested in your usual topics.: 0 people
 - The level of English is too advanced for me.: 0 people
 
 

11. What did you like the most today?
- Responses: 5 people (21.74% of attendees)
 
Note: Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.
Was surprised by the advances
Moderator Humor
Extraordinarily well structure and compact overview of currently available GenAI tools/plattforms/services that are worth trying. [Typo fixed]
It was fun!
Got a very good overview on AI tools.
12. What did you like the least?
- Responses: 1 person (4.35% of attendees)
 
Note: Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.
Results of practical session were not presented.
