Rationality Freiburg

Statistics: Applied Rationality (Closed Meetup)

April 27, 2025

Read more about this event.

See also the 2025 summary.

Attendees

  • Total: 18 people
  • Recurring: 18 people
  • New: 0 people

1. Practical use: For my life, what we did today will have …

  • Responses: 17 people (94.44% of attendees)
  • Answers:
    • a lot of practical use (1): 3 people
    • quite a bit of practical use (2): 7 people
    • some practical use (3): 2 people
    • little practical use (4): 3 people
    • very little practical use (5): 2 people
  • Average answer: 2.65 (σ=1.32)

1. Practical use: For my life, what we did today will have …

2. The atmosphere / vibe was …

  • Responses: 17 people (94.44% of attendees)
  • Answers:
    • fantastic (1): 8 people
    • good (2): 6 people
    • okay (3): 3 people
    • bad (4): 0 people
    • horrible (5): 0 people
  • Average answer: 1.71 (σ=0.77)

2. The atmosphere / vibe was …

3. The amount of content / exercises covered was …

  • Responses: 17 people (94.44% of attendees)
  • Answers:
    • way too much (1): 0 people
    • too much (2): 4 people
    • just right (3): 12 people
    • too little (4): 1 person
    • way too little (5): 0 people
  • Average answer: 2.82 (σ=0.53)

3. The amount of content / exercises covered was …

4. The difficulty level of the content / discussion was …

  • Responses: 17 people (94.44% of attendees)
  • Answers:
    • much too easy (1): 0 people
    • too easy (2): 1 person
    • just right (3): 15 people
    • too difficult (4): 1 person
    • much too difficult (5): 0 people
  • Average answer: 3.00 (σ=0.35)

4. The difficulty level of the content / discussion was …

5. Structure: On the whole the event needed …

  • Responses: 17 people (94.44% of attendees)
  • Answers:
    • much more structure (1): 0 people
    • more structure (2): 2 people
    • (was just right) (3): 14 people
    • less structure (4): 1 person
    • much less structure (5): 0 people
  • Average answer: 2.94 (σ=0.43)

5. Structure: On the whole the event needed …

6. The moderation should have been …

  • Responses: 17 people (94.44% of attendees)
  • Answers:
    • much more relaxed (1): 0 people
    • more relaxed (2): 0 people
    • (was just right) (3): 16 people
    • more assertive (4): 1 person
    • much more assertive (5): 0 people
  • Average answer: 3.06 (σ=0.24)

6. The moderation should have been …

7. Host preparation: The content / exercises were …

  • Responses: 17 people (94.44% of attendees)
  • Answers:
    • very well prepared (1): 2 people
    • well prepared (2): 13 people
    • okay prepared (3): 1 person
    • not well prepared (4): 1 person
    • not well prepared at all (5): 0 people
  • Average answer: 2.06 (σ=0.66)

7. Host preparation: The content / exercises were …

8. Changing your mind: The event made me …

  • Responses: 17 people (94.44% of attendees)
  • Answers:
    • question many things (1): 1 person
    • question some things (2): 9 people
    • question few things (3): 3 people
    • question very few things (4): 3 people
    • not question anything (5): 1 person
  • Average answer: 2.65 (σ=1.06)

8. Changing your mind: The event made me …

9. Do you think you will come to one (or more) of the next three events?

  • Responses: 17 people (94.44% of attendees)
  • Answers:
    • probably no: 3 people
    • probably yes: 14 people

9. Do you think you will come to one (or more) of the next three events?

10. If you answered “probably no” in the previous question or are very uncertain, why is that?

  • Responses: 7 people (38.89% of attendees)
  • Answers:
    • Friday evening is a bad timeslot for me.: 2 people
    • I can’t fit another activity into my life.: 2 people
    • I did not like (some of) the people here.: 0 people
    • I did not like today’s venue.: 0 people
    • I live too far away.: 2 people
    • I’m not very interested in your usual topics.: 1 person
    • The level of English is too advanced for me.: 0 people

10. If you answered “probably no” in the previous question or are very uncertain, why is that?

11. What did you like the most today?

  • Responses: 13 people (72.22% of attendees)

Note: Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.

The hot seat activity

The hot seat exercise made me feel more connected and have better understanding of the other people there.

Anti Self Deception

Die Hot Seat Übung

All activities were great. And also felt they were a good combination of whole group, individual, small group activities.

The hot seat exercise

Topics and hot seat introduction

OODA loops and self deception info and hot seat

hotseat und präsentationen

hot seat - really great idea
the post about self-deception

Focus on practical application

Self deception

Hot Seat

12. What did you like the least?

  • Responses: 10 people (55.56% of attendees)

Note: Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.

Hot Seat (didn’t think it had much use. Maybe better as a prepared Event so everyone can prepare good questions. Or with pre-printented questions and the option to go away from them any time)

Die Einleitung zur Hostile Telepathy war etwas zu lang, aber trotzdem nützlich

The explanation for the last two activities took maybe longer than it could have.

Explanation for hostile telepathy was too long.

Self deception exercises

median fragerunde

The ice breaker exercises did not seem relevant for the later methods (since those were individual not group exercises)

Ooda-too simple

Hostile Telepath

The topics discussed did not have much impact for me. I don’t feel closer to enlightenment. (sorry! Not meant as an offense! They were well presented.)