Read more about this event.

See also the 2025 summary.

Attendees

• Total: 20 people
• Recurring: 20 people
• New: 0 people

1. Practical use: For my life, what we did today will have …

• Responses: 17 people (85.00% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • a lot of practical use (1): 2 people
  • quite a bit of practical use (2): 6 people
  • some practical use (3): 6 people
  • little practical use (4): 2 people
  • very little practical use (5): 1 person
• Average answer: 2.65 (σ=1.06)

2. The atmosphere / vibe was …

• Responses: 17 people (85.00% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • fantastic (1): 12 people
  • good (2): 4 people
  • okay (3): 1 person
  • bad (4): 0 people
  • horrible (5): 0 people
• Average answer: 1.35 (σ=0.61)

3. The amount of content / exercises covered was …

• Responses: 17 people (85.00% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • way too much (1): 0 people
  • too much (2): 2 people
  • just right (3): 13 people
  • too little (4): 2 people
  • way too little (5): 0 people
• Average answer: 3.00 (σ=0.50)

4. The difficulty level of the content / discussion was …

• Responses: 17 people (85.00% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • much too easy (1): 3 people
  • too easy (2): 4 people
  • just right (3): 10 people
  • too difficult (4): 0 people
  • much too difficult (5): 0 people
• Average answer: 2.41 (σ=0.80)

5. Structure: On the whole the event needed …

• Responses: 17 people (85.00% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • much more structure (1): 1 person
  • more structure (2): 2 people
  • (was just right) (3): 13 people
  • less structure (4): 0 people
  • much less structure (5): 1 person
• Average answer: 2.88 (σ=0.78)

6. The moderation should have been …

• Responses: 17 people (85.00% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • much more relaxed (1): 0 people
  • more relaxed (2): 1 person
  • (was just right) (3): 12 people
  • more assertive (4): 2 people
  • much more assertive (5): 2 people
• Average answer: 3.29 (σ=0.77)

7. Host preparation: The content / exercises were …

• Responses: 17 people (85.00% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • very well prepared (1): 6 people
  • well prepared (2): 5 people
  • okay prepared (3): 4 people
  • not well prepared (4): 2 people
  • not well prepared at all (5): 0 people
• Average answer: 2.12 (σ=1.05)

8. Changing your mind: The event made me …

• Responses: 17 people (85.00% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • question many things (1): 0 people
  • question some things (2): 8 people
  • question few things (3): 6 people
  • question very few things (4): 2 people
  • not question anything (5): 1 person
• Average answer: 2.76 (σ=0.90)

9. Do you think you will come to one (or more) of the next three events?

• Responses: 17 people (85.00% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • probably no: 0 people
  • probably yes: 17 people

10. If you answered “probably no” in the previous question or are very uncertain, why is that?

• Responses: 0 people (0.00% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • Friday evening is a bad timeslot for me.: 0 people
  • I can’t fit another activity into my life.: 0 people
  • I did not like (some of) the people here.: 0 people
  • I did not like today’s venue.: 0 people
  • I live too far away.: 0 people
  • I’m not very interested in your usual topics.: 0 people
  • The level of English is too advanced for me.: 0 people

11. What did you like the most today?

• Responses: 12 people (60.00% of attendees)

Note: Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.

Sharing perspectives about relationships

I think the topic was really great overall, something different and also one where rationality has its limits. Also quite liked the topic based groupings.

Feeling the effort that was put into this event by organizers to make it nice and comfortable for everyone.

The decoupling blog post and the discussion about it

Groups. Thank you Matthias!

discussion

Struktur, Gespräche

Thank you to Matthias for writing the algorithm

Great tool to create the discussion groups! Also the discussion rounds

The decoupler coupling post

Very good vibes, I felt very comfortable with the other people in my groups.

readings

12. What did you like the least?

• Responses: 5 people (25.00% of attendees)

Note: Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.

The nice guy essay felt unnecessarily long and drawn out.

If anything, mayby that the topics to choose, could have been outlined more precisely, e.g. by introducing them and creating more of a common sense!?

topic

Niceness article

unstructured discussion