Read more about this event.

See also the 2025 summary.

Attendees

• Total: 19 people
• Recurring: 15 people
• New: 4 people

1. Practical use: For my life, what we did today will have …

• Responses: 15 people (78.95% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • a lot of practical use (1): 3 people
  • quite a bit of practical use (2): 6 people
  • some practical use (3): 5 people
  • little practical use (4): 0 people
  • very little practical use (5): 1 person
• Average answer: 2.33 (σ=1.05)

2. The atmosphere / vibe was …

• Responses: 15 people (78.95% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • fantastic (1): 5 people
  • good (2): 8 people
  • okay (3): 1 person
  • bad (4): 1 person
  • horrible (5): 0 people
• Average answer: 1.87 (σ=0.83)

3. The amount of content / exercises covered was …

• Responses: 15 people (78.95% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • way too much (1): 0 people
  • too much (2): 4 people
  • just right (3): 9 people
  • too little (4): 2 people
  • way too little (5): 0 people
• Average answer: 2.87 (σ=0.64)

4. The difficulty level of the content / discussion was …

• Responses: 15 people (78.95% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • much too easy (1): 0 people
  • too easy (2): 3 people
  • just right (3): 11 people
  • too difficult (4): 1 person
  • much too difficult (5): 0 people
• Average answer: 2.87 (σ=0.52)

5. Structure: On the whole the event needed …

• Responses: 15 people (78.95% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • much more structure (1): 0 people
  • more structure (2): 3 people
  • (was just right) (3): 11 people
  • less structure (4): 1 person
  • much less structure (5): 0 people
• Average answer: 2.87 (σ=0.52)

6. The moderation should have been …

• Responses: 15 people (78.95% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • much more relaxed (1): 0 people
  • more relaxed (2): 0 people
  • (was just right) (3): 11 people
  • more assertive (4): 4 people
  • much more assertive (5): 0 people
• Average answer: 3.27 (σ=0.46)

7. Host preparation: The content / exercises were …

• Responses: 15 people (78.95% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • very well prepared (1): 3 people
  • well prepared (2): 8 people
  • okay prepared (3): 4 people
  • not well prepared (4): 0 people
  • not well prepared at all (5): 0 people
• Average answer: 2.07 (σ=0.70)

8. Changing your mind: The event made me …

• Responses: 15 people (78.95% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • question many things (1): 3 people
  • question some things (2): 7 people
  • question few things (3): 4 people
  • question very few things (4): 0 people
  • not question anything (5): 1 person
• Average answer: 2.27 (σ=1.03)

9. Do you think you will come to one (or more) of the next three events?

• Responses: 15 people (78.95% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • probably no: 1 person
  • probably yes: 14 people

10. If you answered “probably no” in the previous question or are very uncertain, why is that?

• Responses: 1 person (5.26% of attendees)
• Answers:
  • Friday evening is a bad timeslot for me.: 0 people
  • I can’t fit another activity into my life.: 0 people
  • I did not like (some of) the people here.: 0 people
  • I did not like today’s venue.: 0 people
  • I live too far away.: 1 person
  • I’m not very interested in your usual topics.: 0 people
  • The level of English is too advanced for me.: 0 people

11. What did you like the most today?

• Responses: 9 people (47.37% of attendees)

Note: Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.

Very interesting aspects for discussion.

Augen von allen und Gefühl der Gemeinschaft zwischen diversen Leuten, die einander nicht kennen.

The topic was quite interesting and thought-provoking

New concepts and tools: Dysrationalia and Split/commit

New information

Nice, welcoming vibe for newcomers

Topic and discussions

Here is open to discuss platform and no one judge..

Atmosphere, Vibe

12. What did you like the least?

• Responses: 8 people (42.11% of attendees)

Note: Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.

Making definitions on beforehand might have been useful to avoid or reduce blurry discussion contributions.

Wenig Sauerstoff im Zimmer

Appreciated most of the in-presentation discussions but sometimes felt it got sidetracked

We got stuck too often in discussions during the presentation

The presentation and the interactive parts could have been more intermixed

We spend too much time arguing about terminologies without discussing what to do about differences in intelligence in people at a social level

Didn’t get more time for discussions. Multiple rounds of discussions would have helped

Stale Air