Statistics: P(Doom) 2.0: Should We Prioritize the Long-Term Future?
September 14, 2025Read more about this event.
See also the 2025 summary.
Attendees
- Total: 20 people
- Recurring: 15 people
- New: 5 people
1. Practical use: For my life, what we did today will have …
- Responses: 16 people (80.00% of attendees)
- Answers:
- a lot of practical use (1): 0 people
- quite a bit of practical use (2): 5 people
- some practical use (3): 4 people
- little practical use (4): 3 people
- very little practical use (5): 4 people
- Average answer: 3.38 (σ=1.20)
2. The atmosphere / vibe was …
- Responses: 16 people (80.00% of attendees)
- Answers:
- fantastic (1): 3 people
- good (2): 10 people
- okay (3): 3 people
- bad (4): 0 people
- horrible (5): 0 people
- Average answer: 2.00 (σ=0.63)
3. The amount of content / exercises covered was …
- Responses: 16 people (80.00% of attendees)
- Answers:
- way too much (1): 0 people
- too much (2): 2 people
- just right (3): 9 people
- too little (4): 5 people
- way too little (5): 0 people
- Average answer: 3.19 (σ=0.66)
4. The difficulty level of the content / discussion was …
- Responses: 16 people (80.00% of attendees)
- Answers:
- much too easy (1): 1 person
- too easy (2): 6 people
- just right (3): 8 people
- too difficult (4): 1 person
- much too difficult (5): 0 people
- Average answer: 2.56 (σ=0.73)
5. Structure: On the whole the event needed …
- Responses: 16 people (80.00% of attendees)
- Answers:
- much more structure (1): 0 people
- more structure (2): 5 people
- (was just right) (3): 10 people
- less structure (4): 1 person
- much less structure (5): 0 people
- Average answer: 2.75 (σ=0.58)
6. The moderation should have been …
- Responses: 16 people (80.00% of attendees)
- Answers:
- much more relaxed (1): 0 people
- more relaxed (2): 0 people
- (was just right) (3): 9 people
- more assertive (4): 5 people
- much more assertive (5): 2 people
- Average answer: 3.56 (σ=0.73)
7. Host preparation: The content / exercises were …
- Responses: 16 people (80.00% of attendees)
- Answers:
- very well prepared (1): 4 people
- well prepared (2): 9 people
- okay prepared (3): 2 people
- not well prepared (4): 1 person
- not well prepared at all (5): 0 people
- Average answer: 2.00 (σ=0.82)
8. Changing your mind: The event made me …
- Responses: 16 people (80.00% of attendees)
- Answers:
- question many things (1): 2 people
- question some things (2): 6 people
- question few things (3): 2 people
- question very few things (4): 3 people
- not question anything (5): 3 people
- Average answer: 2.94 (σ=1.39)
9. Do you think you will come to one (or more) of the next three events?
- Responses: 16 people (80.00% of attendees)
- Answers:
- probably no: 0 people
- probably yes: 16 people
10. If you answered “probably no” in the previous question or are very uncertain, why is that?
- Responses: 0 people (0.00% of attendees)
- Answers:
- Friday evening is a bad timeslot for me.: 0 people
- I can’t fit another activity into my life.: 0 people
- I did not like (some of) the people here.: 0 people
- I did not like today’s venue.: 0 people
- I live too far away.: 0 people
- I’m not very interested in your usual topics.: 0 people
- The level of English is too advanced for me.: 0 people
11. What did you like the most today?
- Responses: 10 people (50.00% of attendees)
Note: Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.
Discussion
The structure and breaking up into groups worked well this time
Diskussionen und der Inhalt
Discussions
Interessante (für mich neue) Aspekte in der Diskussion
Topic
Learning about the concepts
Die Diskussionen darüber, wie und ob wir die Zukunft beeinflussen können
Discussion
Vibe, Discussion Round 2, noticing that nearly everyone was 2 or 3 on the scale
12. What did you like the least?
- Responses: 7 people (35.00% of attendees)
Note: Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.
there was one person who was a bit annoying… [Edited to make the person less identifiable. The information has been noted.]
The topic was so wide, with lots of possibilities, it could be more narrowed down
Teilnehmer, der sich aus meiner Sicht etwas unangenehm verhalten hat. [Information has been noted.]
Serious presentations, could be combined with more fun
Dass die Zeit so schnell vergangen ist :)
Lack Structure/ preparation of the of the discussion question
Little Application of something useful in life…for guiding important decisions
I didn’t like one person in Discussion Round 1 [Edited to make the person less identifiable. The information has been noted.]